• If you log in, the ads disappear in the forum and gallery. If you need help logging in or getting registered, send request to: webmaster@southernairboat.com

Another idiot!!!

The vessel of our favorite pastime has received many very positive accolades (along with it's owners & operators) in the last couple of years & it's unique abilities are now being recognized worldwide creating strong demand for these vessels.

Unfortunately, many of the new owners do not take seriously the nuances of operating one of these vessels, allow for proper training or, more importantly, regular and emergency stick time to understand the capabilities & safe operation of THEIR particular vessel.

Hopefully, this sad incident will be a "wake up call" nationally on the issue.

The FAA leadership is strongly committed to safe airboat operation and positive press for airboats & their operators. We will continue to aggressively promote airboats to save lives and communicate the volunteerism of our private airboat owners and the service we provide to our fellow man.

Please bear in mind that there is little to no information on airboats and their operation outside of our circle. These types of stories, if we don't provide background information and knowledgeable sources to the reporters, can quickly turn "anti-airboat." Behind the scenes, FAA leadership spend many hours speaking to the reporter on this story and other news publications so they had basic understanding of the issue and knowledgeable folks to interview on the subject. As with any new subject, (this happens with all media), your words can misinterpreted or misquoted, which happened in this story. However, failure to communicate could result in a damaging or incorrect story.

As a topic of comment on this forum, what do ya'll think? Should we continue to attempt to aggressively set the record straight with media, provide contacts and information sources for any story regarding airboats (Same with hunting, Conservation, Southern heritage, Second Amendment issues) or should we just roll over & play dead and be happy with whatever our detractors or anyone else says about airboats or their operators?

Happy hunting,

Phil Walters

On a similar topic, the FAA is in the process of raising funds to retain Bonnie as our voice in Tallahassee. One goal for her in 2007 will be to strengthen the 2/3 majority non discrimination language to full non discrimination wording for airboats, the same wording that personal watercraft has in the statues.
Are you willing to support a voice in Tallahassee for our goals with your $$$$$?

Last, when are we going to put the lies & distortions of the anti-hunters and animal rights people to bed and start sustainable hunting of bears in Florida?
 
I`d be willing to donate as long as we don`t get any more flags or silly stuff like that again :D
 
I PERSONAL DONT KNOW ( PW ) ! BUT I KNOW HIS GOOD DEEDS WAY OUT DO HIS BAD ! HE DONT HIDE HIS INTENT ! HE DID A LOT FOR THE CAUSE ! HE DOES ALOT BEHIND THE SCENES! HE HAS A HABIT OF GETTING EVERBODY ATTENION ! BUT REMEMBER THATS HIS JOB ! DONT AGREE ON ALL HIS VIEWS! BUT RESPECT WHAT HE IS ! :shock:
 
I can't think of any other dog I would rather have in this fight (figuratively speaking) so everybody who complains about him show me a better dog. Because I aint seen one yet
 
I'd like to know what level of success would be considered sustainable hunting of bears. Where is the line between sustainable and non-sustainable? Do we wish to have a marginally increasing population or a net zero gin population?

What constitutes sustainable hunting of bears? I'm asking because I dont know the answer.

Scotty
 
Bears:

About 200 are killed each year in Florida via car collision. Complaints of destruction and livestock depredation are around 1,000 per year. With a population of 3,000-4,000, sustainable harvest should fall in the 10% of the population range.
New Jersey has had two public hunting seasons and bear complaints are down about 60%.
 
Blackpowder,

I have asked for your statements to be reposted.

I will be happy to clarify & refute all your accusations and innuendo; however, you are not getting off the hook with your statement of "I was told by so & so" to substantiate your claims. Nor will "I'll resort to "fist'a'cuffs" as clarification because you have no other argument. This BS does not work in the public area nor will I accept it in this forum or anywhere else or from ANYONE when I am attacked. You will have to do better that that.

How about providing quotes from my past postings, copies of e-mail dialog, names, dates, places ect to back your statements?

I'm sure you will find:

A) Substantiating & documenting BS takes a lot of time, wastes our resources and does not advance our goals or agenda against our detractors

AND

B) Your claims have no merit, are baseless, nor is there ANYTHING to substantiate them other than a "he said/she said" which does not substantiate anything.


It's so darn easy for liberals, anti's and do-nothings to make accusations against those who take a stand & lead by simply making false statements and depending on a one sentence defense.

I will vigorously defend my good name, actions, statements & reputation as both a person & a leader.

Very weak position you have taken, my friend, now elaborate and substantiate..........

A statement of retraction of your false claims and an apology and will be accepted if you are man enough to admit a mistake. If not, then start proving.......It will take more than a sentence.

Happy hunting,

PW
 
I don't know where you heard that that I said "I'll resort to "fist'a'cuffs" about anything...apparently maybe we are both getting some distorted info????

After thinking, I realize the fact that perhaps this forum wasn't the best place to post that information. I therefore removed all my posts on the subject. Although I wholeheartedly believe it to be true, I cannot prove them without involving several others in our squabble and I will not do that.

So, due to the fact that I am unwilling and therefore unable to prove what I said about Phil Walters, I hope everyone will understand that it shouldn't be considered true. They were rumors which had no business on this site. That's why I removed my statements.

I am sorry Phil for causing this public scene and forcing you to defend your reputation. I sincerely do not like you as a person or a leader however that does not give me the right to attack you on this site. I was wrong.

I apologize to Rick for violating the rules of SAO and conducting a personal attack on someone here, and I apologize to the rest of the members for starting this distraction.

Sincerely,
Adam Wetherington
 
It takes a big big man to say I was wrong.

I agree with just about every word you just posted above Adam.
You zeroed in on this one, and hit a bullseye right there.

I had substaintial respect for you before this exchange, and I just gained a whole bunch more with that last post.

I'll be waiting to see how PW responds, and hope he's a tough as you are about this.

Were all big boy's and we all make mistakes.
That goes double for me!
I hope next time I make a mistake, I can follow your example set above.
 
COOL DEAL BPS ! ( WHAT COWBOY SAID TOO ) ALL OF US BEEN THERE ONE TIME OR THE OTHER! I JUST HOPE WE CAN STAND TOGATHER ON TRING TO KEEP OUR RITES AS OUTDOOR MEN ! AND THANKS FOR YOUR CONCERN ! :D
 
Looks like I missed it all...I was out riding.

No problem here Adam, thanks for standing up & doing what you think is right.

One more thing....this thread started out as an unfortunate airboat related news story, then turned political so I'm moving it to "Airboat Regulations & Politics".

Rick
 
Good show Adam ! The only person who doesnt make mistakes are those who do nothing at all.

To err is nothing short of human. To make a flat statement like you did raises one to the top of the human category.

Its also manly to make it clear when you flat dont like someone personally. Thats not attacking, thats simply clearing the air so there is no mistake.

You have my admiration Adam.

Scotty
 
Back
Top