• If you log in, the ads disappear in the forum and gallery. If you need help logging in or getting registered, send request to: webmaster@southernairboat.com

NO MORE AIRBOAT CURFEW IN CITRUS COUNY!!

somedumbredneck

Well-known member
I read in Fridays paper that citrus county tried to convict 2 guys for the 11pm curfew and the prosecutor had to throw it out. they say it no longer stands as law and they will not charge anyone that is sited by law enforcement.. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
How about that?

What's going to happen if 1% of airboat owners decide they want to run hard all night in Citrus County (unless you have one very, very quiet airboat) in the river & the marsh? Do you think the multitude of folks trying to sleep will stand for it?
I hope the users will create self policing ideas that are enforceable to keep the unreasonable trouble makers off the waterways. If not the 99% of reasonable users will pay the price for the misfits and the rules will be written by those who want the sound & it's source gone.
The net fishermen were in Florida for 4 centuries and are gone by Constitutional Amendment. Learn from past mistakes.
 
From the Citrus Co. Chronicle
Offical: Airboat law unclear
By Terry Witt

Assistant County Attorney Michele Lieberman said Thursday she plans to drop misdemeanor criminal charges against two Inverness men cited by the sheriff’s office Dec. 30 for violating a nighttime airboat curfew that no longer exists.

Christopher Michael Frye, 34, of 701 S. Little John Ave., Inverness, and Aaron Richard Bergwerff, 22, of 749 Red Bud Terrace, Inverness, were stopped at 12 a.m. on the Withlacoochee River for operating airboats between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. in violation of the county airboat curfew.

The pair was issued criminal citations and ordered to appear in court on Jan. 25, but Lieberman said the curfew is no longer valid and she has no choice but to drop the charges. She said if the sheriff’s office continues to cite people for the curfew in the future, those charges will also be dropped.

Frye and his passenger, Michael Allen Stork, 49, of 309 N. Citrus Ave., Inverness, won’t escape criminal prosecution completely. They face multiple wildlife violations for shooting a doe deer from their airboat on the same night, according to a sheriff’s report. It was the poaching that attracted the attention of sheriff’s deputies.

After deputies found the poaching suspects, officers in boats worked with deputies in the air (equipped with an infrared camera) to find the doe. The deer had died of multiple gunshot wounds. The wildlife violations were issued by officers of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the report said.

As for the curfew, Lieberman said sheriff’s office General Counsel Richard Wesch was warned in a July 17 memo that the curfew ordinance was no longer valid and should not be enforced. She said a law passed by the Legislature in 2006 voided the county’s nighttime curfew for airboats.

“If the Legislature says we can no longer do it, it’s no longer effective,” she said.

An airboat curfew has existed in Citrus County since 1978, but was modified in 1989 and 2000, Lieberman said.

In 2006, she said the Legislature passed a law preventing local governments from discriminating against airboats except by a two-thirds vote of a governing body enacting an ordinance. She said the new state law voided Citrus County’s curfew.

She said the Citrus County Commission could re-enact the old curfew by a two-thirds vote or it could repeal the old law and pass a new one. But she said the old ordinance, in her view, became invalid on July 1 when Section 327.60 of state statutes was amended.

Lieberman is the chief assistant county attorney but also serves as a prosecutor for cases involving criminal violations of county ordinances. She said her interpretation of the new state statute was a conservative one, but that was because violations of the curfew can result in criminal arrests, which can be placed on the personal records of the person cited.

She wrote to Wesch on Jan. 12 reminding him of the July 17 memo he had received about the curfew ordinance being invalid and asked him to remind deputies the curfew was no longer on the books.

“The county’s position at that time, as the Citrus County Sheriff’s Office was informed, was that such ordinance should no longer be enforced unless and until the Board (of County Commissioners) chose to reenact such by a two-thirds vote. We are currently drafting an ordinance to address the issue,” Lieberman wrote.

Lieberman said she plans to present a new airboat ordinance to commissioners at one of their February meetings, but the board would need a two-thirds vote to approve it.

Wesch could not be reached for comment, but Sheriff Jeff Dawsy replied through his spokeswoman, Gail Tierney, that he would soon meet with Commissioner John Thrumston about the issue.

“He said we are aware of the whole curfew issues and he plans to meet with Commissioner Thrumston shortly,” Tierney said.
 
There ya go, they are already working on a new ordinance

Agree with Gatorstick on this one folks need to be real careful over there or they might find themselves with more than a curfew. Imagine this for a headline "County-wide airboat ban passes unanimously"

Therein lies the fallacy of the "anti-discrimination clause" they can still vote us out
 
This is what the hard work of the FAA and our lobbyist Bonnie Basham accomplished last year. Way too many people moaned and groaned and questioned her/their work.

Any doubters now!

Can somebody please get addresses?

And will somebody please help with this very important funding when asked this year:roll:

Basketcase
 
I don't think they will past an airboat ban , but sounds like a can of worms will be open, they are just waking the gaint. it will not be that hard to get a vote from the BOCC.

I would hate to miss out riding in Lake Hernando. I could always ride from Hernando County to Citrus to fish in the Gulf. Then they have no say. ya know its some jack a$$ that can blow it for the rest of us. Dont be a duma$$ and break the law. This is really pissing me off.

Hey Billy Bob lets go out and shoot a doe, :tard: :tard: WHAT ARE THEY THINKING. It's like that $%&* for brains that comes back from who knows what he's doing (FWC or CCSO I THINK HE IS RUNNING DRUGS maybe that will get them out there) but he does it at 3,4,5 in the am at Ozelle. How would you like to get a NO MUFFLE airboat come screaming in at the ramp at 4 am. I've seen his airboat...no mufflers There is a way he could come back. Take it wide come around the back pass and come in slow OH ya MUFFLERS

I'll be keeping an eye on this.
 
The Super vote is a joke if they want it they will get it.

If you looking to come up here it's on Hwy 44 and 41 in Inverness.

Board of County Commissioners
110 N. Apopka Avenue
Inverness, Florida 34450
(352)341-6560 - Office
(352)341-6584 - Fax
(352)489-2120 - Toll Free Number for Citrus Springs/Dunnellon area
 
RIGHT HERE basket!! I`m a doubter, sure it over rides the old ordinance but LOOK they are already working on a new one and you can bet it`ll be a lot more strict! It should be NO discrimination!!! Not a 2/3 majority :evil:
 
A1, if they vote unanimously with the language that's in place, then they're liable for a discrimination suit.

Can anyone say "ace in the hole" ?
 
Sorry I'll believe it when I see it you know that they will rewrite it. I guess this will be a test then
 
District 5
joyce.valentino@bocc.citrus.fl.us

District 3
vicki.phillips@bocc.citrus.fl.us

District 1
dennis.damato@bocc.citrus.fl.us

Distric 4
john.thrumston@bocc.citrus.fl.us

District 2
gary.bartell@bocc.citrus.fl.us

Next Meeting
Upcoming Meetings:
Regular Meeting: January 23, 2007 at 1:00 P.M., Citrus County Courthouse, Room 100, 110 N. Apopka Avenue, Inverness, FL 34450
Special Meeting - Impact Fee Update Public Hearing: January 25, 2007 at 9:00 A.M., Citrus County Courthouse, Room 100, 110 N. Apopka Avenue, Inverness, FL 34450
Regular Meeting: February 13, 2007 at 1:00 P.M., Citrus County Courthouse, Room 100, 110 N. Apopka Avenue, Inverness, FL 34450

Oh and by the way this is a County that is taking impact fees from $7,000 to a whopping $17,000.00
 
Olf Art":3svhj22i said:
A1, if they vote unanimously with the language that's in place, then they're liable for a discrimination suit.

Can anyone say "ace in the hole" ?

The very bill that language is in discriminates against airboats.
 
No, my friend, it doesn't. It refers to boating in general. It's as close as we've ever been to a non-discrimination clause. It's a long way from perfect, but it's the start we never had before.
 
So boats in general have to run an orange flag now 10 feet from the bottom of the hull? I was under the impression that was only for airboats.
 
The winds of change are a blowin and it will be a hell of a storm. ..... a 2/3 majority is no big deal and there will be no discrimination lawsuit that will ever hold up. The money for ramp construction may be held up but even that is doubtful and when was the last time anyone saw a new ramp in airboat country.

Run em loud run em proud it is the sound of freedom ..isn't that what they used to say about it??

The law last year has opened up a multiplicity of opportunities for bans on airboats even at the state level because we now have our very own statute which can be amended very easily. can anyone say 90DB @ 50' can anyone say daylight operation only? I beleive the jetski folks are stuck with daytime operation even though they could be fitted with lights just fine. A can of worms? nope its a whole damn worm farm that has been opened up on us and that other saying ... why open up a can of whoopass and only use half of it... well hopefully they don't turn that one around on us.

Just a few thoughts on the subject, bet that deer wasn't really worth it huh??
 
i for one am glad to see a judge interpret the law no matter how flawed in favor of airboater even during the commission of a crime such as taking game with a light an gun ! dont ge t me wrong they make us look bad but its still a victory
 
Plum I am not sure the interpretation was in favor of the airboaters, more of a call to write a new law because the old one was superseded and the county comm. hadn't done it yet so the throw out was required this time.

They probably will fix it soon. Like in february
 
Back
Top